Article

‘엄마 찬스’ : 가족 과외 중 엄마에게 도움 요청하기에 대한 대화분석

임남순1, 노은석2,
Namsoon Im1, Eunseok Ro2,
Author Information & Copyright
1남산고등학교
2부산대학교
1Namsan High School
2Pusan National University
Corresponding author: 부교수 영어교육과 부산대학교 46241 부산 금정구 부산대학로63번길 2 제2사범관 111-2, E-mail: roeunseok@pusan.ac.kr

* 이 과제는 부산대학교 기본연구지원사업(2년)에 의하여 연구되었음(과제번호:20220404003)

ⓒ Copyright 2024 Language Education Institute, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Sep 09, 2024 ; Revised: Dec 03, 2024 ; Accepted: Dec 04, 2024

Published Online: Dec 31, 2024

ABSTRACT

This study explores the phenomenon of “mommy chance” in family tutoring sessions, with emphasis on instances where a tutor, who is an older sibling, refers to their mother for assistance when unable to answer a tutee’s question—a younger sibling’s—on English. By utilizing conversation analysis (CA) as an analytical approach, the study explores how these moments of recruitment for help not only highlight the epistemic status hierarchy within the family but also generate learning opportunities. The analysis reveals that when the tutor encounters knowledge limitations, the act of invoking “mommy chance” leverages the mother’s higher epistemic status, which typically results in problem solving. Specifically, the analysis indicates the following: (1) the mother’s assistance facilitates learning opportunities for both the tutor and tutee; (2) the act of recruiting help from the mother generates learning opportunities; and (3) the tutor creates learning opportunities by refusing “mommy chance” and persistently explaining the subject matter. This study provides insights into the nuanced dynamics of knowledge exchange in “nonformal” educational settings, with emphasis on a particularly unique case of informal learning where a tutor assumes epistemic authority over the tutee while having access to an expert for unresolved issues. The findings contribute to the broader CA literature regarding tutoring practices by illustrating the complex relationship among recruitment for help, negotiating understanding, and bridging knowledge gaps in a familial context.

Keywords: conversation analysis; family tutoring; learning opportunity; recruitment; nonformal educational setting

References

1.

Burch, A. R. (2016). Motivation in interaction: A conversation-analytic perspective (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Hawai'i at Manoa) .

2.

Daşkın, N. C., & Hatipoğlu, Ç. (2019). Reference to a past learning event in teacher turns in an L2 instructional setting. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 16-30 .

3.

Drew, P. (2018). Epistemics in social interaction. Discourse Studies, 20(1), 163-187 .

4.

Drew, P., & Kendrick, K. H. (2018). Searching for trouble: Recruiting assistance through embodied action. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality. 1-15 .

5.

Greer, T. (2016). Multiple involvements in interactional repair: Using smartphones in peer culture to augment lingua franca English. Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, 21, 197-229 .

6.

Hauser, E. (2017). Learning and the immediate use(fulness) of a new vocabulary item. The Modern Language Journal, 101(4), 712-728 .

7.

Heritage J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 299-345 .

8.

Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 1-29 .

9.

Jakonen, T., & Morton, T. (2015). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 73-94 .

10.

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Conversation Analysis, 13-31 .

11.

Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P. (2016). Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 1-19 .

12.

Kim, Y. (2012). Practices for initial recognitional reference and learning opportunities in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6-7), 709-729 .

13.

Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(3), 277-309 .

14.

Koshik, I., & Seo, M. S. (2012). Word (and other) search sequences initiated by language learners. Text & Talk, 32(2), 167-189 .

15.

Kupzyk, S., LaBrot, Z. C., & Collins, M. J. (2023). An updated systematic review on parent tutoring. Education and Treatment of Children, 46(1), 59-75 .

16.

Leyland, C. (2018). Resistance as a resource for achieving consensus: Adjusting advice following competency-based resistance in L2 writing tutorials at a British University. Classroom Discourse, 9(3), 267-287 .

17.

Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 536-550 .

18.

Musk, N. (2022). Using online translation tools in computer-assisted collaborative EFL writing. Classroom Discourse, 13(2), 119-144 .

19.

Nguyen, H. T., Choe, A. T., & Vicentini, C. (2022). Opportunities for second language learning in online search sequences during a computer-mediated tutoring session. Classroom Discourse, 13(2), 145-163 .

20.

Nieboer, P., Huiskes, M., Cnossen, F., Stevens, M., Bulstra, S. K., & Jaarsma, D. A. (2019). Recruiting expertise: How surgical trainees engage supervisors for learning in the operating room. Medical Education, 53(6), 616-627 .

21.

Park, I. (2012). Seeking advice: Epistemic asymmetry and learner autonomy in writing conferences. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(14), 2004-2021 .

22.

Park, I. (2017). Questioning as advice resistance: Writing tutorial interactions with L2 writers. Classroom Discourse, 8(3), 253-270 .

23.

Park, Y. (2011). Advice giving in college EFL writing tutorials. Discourse and Cognition, 18(3), 139-167 .

24.

Park, Y. (2018). Advice receiving in college EFL writing tutorials. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea, 26(1), 159-200 .

25.

Pfeiffer, M., & Anna, M. (2021). Recruiting assistance in early childhood: longitudinal changes in the use of "Oh+X" as a way of reporting trouble in German. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 142-162 .

26.

Ro, E. (2021). The embodied work of teaching grammar and pronunciation in IELTS speaking tutorials. Linguistics and Education, 65, 1-16 .

27.

Ro, E. (2023). Using PowerPoint slides as a resource for coordinating understanding during presentation consultations at an L2 speaking center. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(3), 579-614 .

28.

Seo, M., & Koshik, I. (2010). A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2219-2239 .

29.

Sert, O. (2013). 'Epistemic status check' as an interactional phenomenon in instructed learning settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 45(1), 13-28 .

30.

Sert, O. (2017). Creating opportunities for L2 learning in a prediction activity. System, 70, 14-25 .

31.

Sert, O., & Walsh, S. (2013). The interactional management of claims of insufficient knowledge in English language classrooms. Language and Education, 27(6), 542-565 .

32.

Solem, M. S., Sikveland, R. O., Stokoe, E., & Skovholt, K. (2023). How do students receive help from teachers? Initiating assistance in small group classroom interactions. Applied Linguistics, amad079 .

33.

Stone, P. (2019). Repair sequences in 'off-task'conversations in an EFL university classroom in Japan: Japanese language resources and learning opportunities. Classroom Discourse, 10(2), 188-208 .

34.

Tanner, M. (2017). Taking interaction in literacy events seriously: A conversation analysis approach to evolving literacy practices in the classroom. Language and Education, 31(5), 400-417 .

35.

Tůma, F., & Sherman, T. (2022). Recruiting help in word searches in L2 peer interaction: A multimodal conversation-analytic study. Linguistics and Education, 67, 1-15 .

36.

Waring, H. Z. (2005). Peer tutoring in a graduate writing centre: Identity, expertise, and advice resisting. Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 141-168 .

37.

Waring, H. Z. (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 577-594 .

38.

Wood, D. (2003). The why? what? when? and how? of tutoring: The development of helping and tutoring skills in children. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 7, 1-30 .

39.

Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Identity, context and interaction. Identities in Talk, 87-106 .